by Montag451
n815e wrote:
Neither of those are signs of bad design.
All single play reviews are practically worthless, in my opinion.
A person doesn't have to play a game more than once to decide to like it or not. A reviewer, however, should actually get to know a game before submitting a review.
All single play reviews are practically worthless, in my opinion.
A person doesn't have to play a game more than once to decide to like it or not. A reviewer, however, should actually get to know a game before submitting a review.
Well, I disagree (with all of it). And I think most reviewers would too. And most readers/viewers would as well. I mean, how many times does a movie reviewer need to watch a movie to review it? Or book reviewers? How many years would some one have to play an MMO before being allowed to review it? Seriously, what rules would you impose on reviewers, and how many of those people do you realistically think would try to follow them, or even agree with them?





