by Elfik2018
Jogadora wrote:
Elfik2018 wrote:
Pietro Pomella wrote:
Elfik2018 wrote:
The Israel/Palestine conflict has also been on my mind because of pro-terrorist protesters locally here in Canada. People in my city don't generally protest a lot, and for people to protest in support of terrorism hurts me as a Canadian on a deep level, and I don't even have Jewish relatives. I sought to uncover how people could rationalize this kind of movement, and it's a deep dark web of ideology including but not limited to decolonialism.
Imagine thinking people protesting ethnic cleansing/genocide requires them to be part of some "deep dark web of ideology", their reasons *simply unfathomable* to the casual observer. We sure live in interesting times.
That said, I do agree with @Jogadora that we are getting a bit far from what feels like the target here. Not to pivot too hard away from this bit of the discussion (literally 1984 hours), but I am actually curious whether the anticlimactic win issue was solved with a difficulty bump, assuming OP had the time and inclination to try that approach.
Actually the protesters are the ones shouting genocidal slogans and wanting Israel removed from the map. On the other hand, Israel is being attacked by multiple terrorist groups who have rejected peace settlements many times and instead choose to commit mass murder. Somehow defending against them is "ethnic cleansing"? I'm willing to re-evaluate my position if you give me some evidence. Are you willing to re-evaluate yours?
Actually, both Pietro and I have expressed a desire to return to the topic. Could you respect that please? If you wish to debate someone on this issue, start a thread in RSP.
Edit: oddly enough, your definition of woke didn't match the dictionary's.
You can’t vote to return to the original discussion and then throw in a last word. Well you can, but it makes you a hypocrite.
I’m not sure if you truly want to move on or if you want me to respond to your comment on the definition of woke but for the sake of everyone else I’m going to assume the former.





